Jump to content

User talk:Legolas558

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Prefixitis

[edit]

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Prefixitis, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Prefixitis. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Amalas =^_^= 15:47, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added "{{prod2}}" to second the request for deletion, with more comments in the talk page. We do appreciate contributions, and I welcome a contribution of this nature in an article devoted to software engineering or source code readability that identifies excessive use of mangled identifiers as one possible manifestation of unreadable code. MaxEnt 21:17, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like that article does not meet Wikipedia standards. Next time I'll be more careful --Legolas558 20:23, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gladius DB for deletion

[edit]

The article Gladius DB is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gladius DB until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Simple Bob (talk) 12:23, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]